- Biotech degrees / certificates
- Agricultural/Biofuels Process Technology
- Applied Biotechnology Certificate
- Bioinformatics Certificate
- Biofuels Technician
- Biomanufacturing Associates Degree
- Biomanufacturing Certificate
- Bioprocess Laboratory Technology
- Biotechnician / Bioscience certificate
- Biotechnology Associates degree
- Clinical Research Professional
- Environmental Laboratory Technologist
- Genomics Technology Certificate
- Medical Devices Certificate
- Post Baccalaureate Certificate
- Post-Baccalaureate Intensive Certificate
- Quality Control
- Regulatory Affairs Associates degree
- Regulatory Affairs Certificate
- Regulatory Compliance Technologist
- Stem Cell Certificate
- Event Materials
- Photo Gallery
Honk if you use scientific literature
Do you use scientific papers in your classroom? Speak up or open access may go away.
Three seemly unrelated items related to the use of primary literature appeared in my Twitter feed and email these past few days.
- The first item was a professional development opportunity in Geneva, NY, on a teaching strategy involving primary literature (C.R.E.A.T.E.). The application deadline is January 15th. C.R.E.A.T.E. June workshops
The C.R.E.A.T.E. strategy includes using primary literature in teaching undergraduates, a practice that's long been employed by Bio-Link instructors.
- The second was a paper on the contamination of commericial RT-PCR reagents with Murine Leukemia virus and mouse DNA.
- The third is the Research Works Act, a bill in the House of Representatives designed to roll back access to NIH sponsored research.
The common thread is that they all involve access to the scientific literature. The workshop depends on it. I wouldn't have been able to read the paper without it and the last item is about a bill to take it away.
In other words, if you've been using PubMed or having your students read papers, watch out. If this bill passes, it's going to be a lot harder to use scientific papers in your classroom.
The rationale behind the Research Works Act is that it supposedly costs publishers a great deal to publish scientific papers and they should be able to recoup the costs by charging large fees. If you have ever tried to purchase access to a scientific publication, you know the fees typically run about $30 an article. This is far too high a price for most of us and would make it prohibitively expensive us to continue having students read scientific literature in our courses. Some of you may have access to scientific journals through library subscriptions, but neither of the community colleges where I teach seem to have this luxury.
Not only would the Research Works Act take away the access that we have to NIH funded research now, it would prohibit any similar measures requiring access to peer-reviewed publications from being implemented in the future.
If this issue is important to you, it would be good to speak out and write your congress person.
More background on the bill can be found here: